Another nugget from IP
-----Original Message-----
From: David Farber [mailto:dave@farber.net]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 5:25 AM
To: ip
Subject: [IP] Another Voice Warns of an Innovation Slowdown - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/technology/01estrin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
September 1, 2008
Another Voice Warns of an Innovation Slowdown
By CLAIRE CAIN MILLER
MENLO PARK, Calif. - Judy Estrin, 53, has spent her entire career in
Silicon Valley, a region that thrives on constant innovation. Ms.
Estrin, the former chief technology officer of Cisco Systems, has
founded four technology companies.
Yet she is deeply worried that Silicon Valley - and the United States
as a whole - no longer foster the kind of innovation necessary to
develop groundbreaking technologies and sustain economic growth.
"I am generally not an alarmist, but I have become more and more
concerned about the state of our country and its innovation," she said
last week, explaining why she wrote her book, "Closing the Innovation
Gap," which arrives in bookstores Tuesday. "We have a national
innovation deficit."
Ms. Estrin's book is the latest call to action during the last several
years by scientists, technologists and political leaders worried about
the country's future competitiveness in technology.
In 2005, the National Academies published "Rising Above the Gathering
Storm," a report requested by Congress, which found that federal
financing of research in the physical sciences was 45 percent less in
2004 than in 1976 and that 93 percent of students in grades five
through eight learn science from teachers who do not hold degrees or
certifications in the topics. In 2007, the book "Innovation Nation" by
John Kao, a business consultant, revived the debate.
And this year, both presidential candidates have made government
support of innovation and technology a central part of their campaign
platforms.
Still, not all technology watchers agree with Ms. Estrin about the
extent of the innovation problem - or whether there is a problem at all.
"The whole innovation crisis thing is a bit overblown," said Paul
Saffo, a technology forecaster. Innovation in the natural world, in
the form of mutation, is lethal, so species do it only when they are
under dire stress, he said. "What makes Silicon Valley unique is that
this place has stumbled onto a way to sustain innovation even when the
place is doing well," he said.
Ms. Estrin argues that short-term thinking and a reluctance to take
risks are causing a noticeable lag in innovation. She cites a variety
of contributing factors. A decline in federal and university financing
for research has dried up new ideas, she said. When research does
produce new technologies, entrepreneurs and the venture capitalists
who back them have been too cautious to make big bets - especially
after the costly failures of the dot-com bust. If start-up companies
do find financing, she said, new regulations make it hard for them to
grow, and the focus of investors on short-term performance discourages
companies from taking risks.
Ms. Estrin's suggestions for bolstering innovation range from the
vague, like advising venture capitalists and entrepreneurs to take
more risks, to the specific, like mandating that schools pay teachers
higher salaries.
Some of her prescriptions are unlikely to become reality, like her
idea for a new government body modeled after the Federal Reserve that
sets science policy without Congressional input.
Some thinkers on innovation agree with Ms. Estrin's assessment. "There
is a remarkable telescoping in of vision and an unwillingness to make
long-term bets," said Vinton G. Cerf, the chief Internet evangelist at
Google.
Mr. Cerf led the development of the networking protocols that form the
basic architecture of the Internet, a project to which Ms. Estrin
contributed as a graduate student. He points to the Internet as an
example of the need for long-term research and financing, since
development of the technology used to transmit data online required
two decades of government support.
Robert Compton, a venture capitalist and entrepreneur, said that the
United States is losing its innovation edge to China and India.
Chinese and Indian children are required to take more science courses
than students in the United States, said Mr. Compton, who recently
produced a documentary comparing high school education in the three
countries. Of college graduates, 30 percent to 45 percent in India and
China have engineering degrees, compared with 5 percent in the United
States. Venture financing and patent applications are falling in
Europe and the United States and rising in China and India, he said.
Most alarming to Mr. Compton is that 60 percent of engineering
doctorates from American universities are granted to foreign
nationals, but they are no longer staying here to work. "The American
economy is not as exciting as China and India, and a lot of them are
going back home," he said.
Ms. Estrin and others acknowledge that the recent surge in financing
for alternative energy companies is a sign that innovation is alive
and well in some sectors. Still, she is concerned that investors will
not have the patience to build these companies.
"If they treat these companies the same way they treated others - a
couple years in, they need to see returns or cut the burn rate or
start cutting people - they are not going to get to where we need to
go," she said.
Some who track innovation in the United States say the alarm bells are
unnecessary and sound like a repeat of similar fears in past decades
that turned out to be unfounded.
A June study from the RAND Corporation found that 40 percent of the
world's spending on scientific research and development comes from the
United States. The country employs 70 percent of the world's Nobel
Prize winners and is home to 75 percent of the top 40 universities.
"The United States is still the world leader in science and
technology," said the study's co-author, James Hosek.
But Ms. Estrin said that the technologies at the root of new products
like Apple's iPod or the Facebook social networking service were
actually developed several decades ago. If a new round of fundamental
innovation isn't seeded now, the country will suffer in the next decade.
She compared the situation to a tree that appears to be growing well,
but whose roots are rotting underground.
"Too much of it is short-term, incremental innovation, and the roots
of the tree aren't happy," she said.
-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
DISCLAIMER:
E-mail Confidentiality/Proprietary Notice: The information contained in this transmission may be proprietary and subject to protection under the law. The message is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the message is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the material from any computer. Thank you.
